Schrier has spent time focused on a few core fights. Each is tied to bills actually introduced or votes actually cast.
01
Expanding children's access to primary careSchrier sponsored the Kids' Access to Primary Care Act (HR.1433), which would address barriers to primary care services for children. She also sponsored legislation to reauthorize public health service programs related to children's health (HR.2960). The bills reflect a recurring focus on pediatric health access across multiple congressional sessions, with HR.1433 reintroduced across ten sessions.
02
Expanding diabetes care and consumer cost limitsSchrier sponsored the Expanding Access to Diabetes Self-Management Training Act (HR.3826), which would broaden coverage for diabetes education and management services. She also sponsored the Capping Costs for Consumers Act in successive sessions (HR.10438, HR.7164), addressing out-of-pocket health care costs. The State Public Option Act (HR.3995) would allow states to establish a public health insurance option.
03
Supporting agricultural research and local food systemsSchrier sponsored the AG RESEARCH Act (HR.3568), which would direct resources toward agricultural research, and legislation to amend the Agricultural Research, Extension, and Education Reform Act of 1998 (HR.3656). She also sponsored the EAT Healthy Foods from Local Farmers Act (HR.6697) and the Partnerships for Agricultural Climate Action Act (HR.6341), each addressing aspects of local food production and farm-level climate adaptation.
04
Forest management, prescribed fire, and conservationSchrier sponsored the Forest Data Modernization Act (HR.1213), the National Prescribed Fire Act (HR.3889), and the ENABLE Conservation Act (HR.5365). These bills address forest data collection, the use of prescribed burns as a land management tool, and conservation program access. She also sponsored the RNGR Support Act (HR.7712), related to ranger programs. The cluster of bills corresponds to land management issues prominent in her district's rural and forested areas.
05
Child care access and domestic manufacturing investmentSchrier sponsored the Improving Child Care for Working Families Act (HR.5558), reintroduced across seven sessions, which would expand child care availability for working families. On the House floor, she voted in favor of the Building Chips in America Act (S.2228), a semiconductor manufacturing measure that became law, casting a vote that aligned with the bill's bipartisan support rather than her party's majority position.
Keep scrolling for the record, votes, and contact info↓
CallD.C. office
EmailVia web form
VisitOfficial site
01 · Background
Who they are, where they came from
Kim Schrier represents Washington's 8th congressional district, a seat she has held since January 3, 2019. The district covers the suburbs east of Seattle, extends across the Cascade Range, and includes rural communities in central Washington as well as the cities of Wenatchee and Ellensburg. Before entering Congress, Schrier worked as a physician. She is a member of the Democratic Party.
In the House, Schrier has sponsored legislation across health care, agriculture, child care, and natural resources. Her health care bills include the Kids' Access to Primary Care Act (HR.1433), which addresses children's access to primary care services, and the Expanding Access to Diabetes Self-Management Training Act (HR.3826). She sponsored the State Public Option Act (HR.3995) and the Capping Costs for Consumers Act (HR.10438, HR.7164), both directed at health insurance costs. On agriculture and natural resources, she sponsored the AG RESEARCH Act (HR.3568), the EAT Healthy Foods from Local Farmers Act (HR.6697), the Partnerships for Agricultural Climate Action Act (HR.6341), the Forest Data Modernization Act (HR.1213), the National Prescribed Fire Act (HR.3889), the ENABLE Conservation Act (HR.5365), and the Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Amendments (HR.6229). She also sponsored the RNGR Support Act (HR.7712) and the Improving Child Care for Working Families Act (HR.5558). On floor votes, Schrier voted in favor of the Building Chips in America Act (S.2228), a semiconductor manufacturing measure that became law, and in favor of the No Foreign Election Interference Act (HR.8314), a measure that passed by a margin of fewer than five votes.
Schrier raised $2.4M this cycle, with 68.4% from individuals and 29.6% from PACs. Individual giving was primarily from itemized contributions, which made up 89.3% of individual receipts. Top PAC contributors include 314 Action Impact Slate, Radiology Partners Inc. PAC, SCAI PAC, Quest Diagnostics, and AUAPAC, among several other medical and health-industry PACs. Top employer concentrations include University of Washington, Microsoft, and Amazon. Outside spending in the cycle totaled $1.1M supporting Schrier — led by Shield PAC at $698K — and $8.2M opposing her, primarily from Congressional Leadership Fund ($5.8M) and NRCC ($2.3M), in independent expenditures separate from her own campaign.
AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION, INC. POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (AUAPAC)FEC ↗$10K
NEW DEMOCRAT COALITION ACTION FUND (NEWDEMS)FEC ↗$7K
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (NECAPAC)FEC ↗$5K
ABBOTT LABORATORIES EMPLOYEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEEFEC ↗$5K
AMERICAN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION INC. PACFEC ↗$5K
SEIU COPE (SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION)FEC ↗$5K
Top employer concentrations
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON$16K· 64 donors
MICROSOFT$14K· 48 donors
D4 LLC$14K· 4 donors
AMAZON$11K· 10 donors
KAISER PERMANENTE$11K· 4 donors
PIVOTAL VENTURES$8K· 3 donors
SEATTLE JAZZED$7K· 2 donors
SEATTLE GENETICS$7K· 2 donors
THE DASCHLE GROUP$6K· 4 donors
Self-reported employer data. Categories like “Retired” and “Not Employed” are excluded — these reflect demographic patterns rather than industry concentrations.
Independent expenditures from super PACs and other groups, separate from contributions to the candidate’s own campaign. These committees may not coordinate with the campaign.
Every claim on this page links to a public source. We don’t tell you whether Kim Schrier is a good or bad official— that’s your call. We just make the facts easy to find.